In the face of
declining research funding, some local hospitals are turning to their doctors
to be more valuable fundraising allies when well-heeled patients want to
donate. Over the past 14 months, Ohio State University’s Wexner Medical Center
has trained about 120 physicians on how to respond appropriately when a patient
broaches the topic of charitable giving.
http://shar.es/11KjB9
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
Tuesday, August 5, 2014
Planned Gift Makes Sports Pages
Guy leaves $100,000 to basketball program, gets news story. If
the school had known, he could have been stewarded while he was still
living!
Thursday, July 31, 2014
Job Announcement -- Director of Research and Prospect Relations, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC
Position Information
Date Posted 07/11/2014
Working Title Director of Research and Prospect Relations
Job Classification Administrator IV
Department Name 01097-Medical and Health Sciences Foundation
Job Type Staff
Position Number 0128228
Hiring Range $44,928.00 - $73,632.00
Position Description The Medical and Health Sciences Foundation (MHSF) is the fundraising entity responsible for the joint philanthropic ventures of UPMC and University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences. The Director of Prospect Relations will lead and manage the prospect moves and research functions for the Medical and Health Sciences Foundation, supervising staff and working closely with development officers and leadership as a partner in achieving fundraising goals.
The Director of Prospect Relations will design systems to identify new major donor prospects; set standards for information organization, storage, maintenance and retrieval; and ensure timely delivery of vital prospect data. This position will oversee moves management, donor/prospect rating and screening, and research. Develop and oversee budget, and policies and procedures for the department. Evaluate research tools and emerging technologies and coordinate vendor relations. Ensure adherence to professional standards and ethics of prospect research and HIPAA guidelines.
Education Required Baccalaureate
Overall Related Experience Level Required 6-9 years experience
Additional Education and/or Experience Essential to the Position Bachelor’s degree in library science, business, writing, liberal arts or related field.
Required Licenses/Certifications
Assignment Category Regular, Full-Time
Percent Effort 100
Scheduled Work Hours 8:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
If Varied Work Schedule, Please Specify
If Part Time, Actual Standard Weekly Hours
Campus Pittsburgh
University Benefits The University offers an excellent comprehensive benefits package for all full-time and part-time regular employees including:
• Education benefits and a retirement plan with employer match
• Group medical insurance, life insurance, and optional vision and dental insurance
• Free transit service within Allegheny County for employees of the Oakland campus (Port Authority Transit)
• Time off benefits including vacation, sick and personal time
For more information regarding the University’s benefits package, please visit www.hr.pitt.edu/benefits
Interested candidates should submit online applications, including cover letter and resume, via PittSource (https://www.pittsource.com/postings/search) for the position of Director of Prospect Relations; Department: 01097-Medical and Health Sciences Foundation; Position Number 0128228. (The working title for this position is Director, Research and Prospect Management).
Wednesday, July 30, 2014
Resource: International Wealth Lists Site
From the wonderful folks at the Helen Brown Group comes a very helpful resource with links to wealth lists worldwide. This resource can be helpful when prospecting, looking for links to the top philanthropists, and more.
Thursday, July 10, 2014
APRA MidSouth members at 2014 APRA International Conference
For APRA MidSouth folks or any APRA International members that live in
Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama or Mississippi, please add a comment below if you are
going to the 2014 conference in Las Vegas. Perhaps this will help MidSouthers
connect and meet each other. Thanks!
Friday, April 25, 2014
Does the Refresh App Hold Promise for Prospect Research?
Finding new
potential donors is a large part of what we do as prospect researchers, but we
are also called to prepare leadership for meetings with prospects. I just read an article about a new app,
called Refresh, might just help in this regard. Basically, the app finds what
it can through social media and then provides a bit of context for it. For
example, it might present the schedule for the Baltimore Orioles if your
prospect is a fan. While the concept is new and the risk for incorrect or
irrelevant connections is high, I can only imagine the promise of this
technology in the future. Do you think it has a place in prospect research?
Thursday, April 3, 2014
Full Disclosure of Political Giving
Even though I’m no lawyer (I don’t even play one on TV), I
wanted to delve into yesterday’s ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in McCutcheon
v. Federal Election Commission. Personal
politics aside (don’t get me started…), I think the decision, at least to my
somewhat simplistic understanding of it, might be a net positive for prospect
research. I’m not so sure it’s a great thing for democracy, but I’m looking for
a silver lining here.
According to an opinion piece by Stanford law professor
Nathaniel Persily in today’s New York Times (sorry if this is behind a pay
wall), the Supreme Court’s ruling “struck down as a violation of the First
Amendment the aggregate limit of $123,200 that an individual could divide up
among candidates and parties.” Persily’s
thinking seems to be that if you set aside whether giving that much money is
good or not, at the very least it will now be disclosed. He puts it much more elegantly: “Any court decision tackling [the problem of
undisclosed gifts] (even unintentionally) should be welcomed, if it levels the
playing field between those who exercise power openly and must face the voters
and those who can never be held accountable.”
My take is that people who might give large gifts secretly to Super PACS
thanks to the Citizen’s United case might now give large gifts directly to
candidates and be required to disclose
those gifts. Because of legal limits, publicly available political giving has
always seemed to skew on the low side, making it difficult to estimate the
donor’s wealth. The folks at DonorSearch
have found that political giving, especially in the $10,000-$15,000 range,
correlates well with the capacity to make very large gifts. It will be interesting to see how the
disclosure will work and if it will give prospect researchers a more accurate
gauge of donor wealth. Please chime in
if you have insights to share.
Mitch Roberson, President, APRA MidSouth
president@apramidsouth.org
Thursday, March 20, 2014
Using Pinterest for Prospect Research
A colleague sent me this article about using
Pinterest for research. It was written from a
marketing perspective, but I wonder if there are applications to prospect
research. Please chime in if you use
Pinterest in your development work.
Friday, February 21, 2014
SEC Filings for Humans
One of my awesome colleagues found a very cool site to look
up SEC filings. It’s called Rank and Filed. Scroll down on the first page and it talks
about how they gather data from EDGAR, index it and return it to the user in a
format to help investors research, investigate and discover companies.
It’s super easy to navigate and search. The really handy and easy to use
part is under Data Export. You can look
up Investment Advisors and it tells you how much in assets they have under
management. Check it out at
Rankandfiled.com.
Friday, February 7, 2014
Review of Prospect Research for Fundraisers
I
recently had the pleasure of reading Jennifer J. Filla and Helen E. Brown’s
book, Prospect Research for Fundraisers –
The Essential Handbook (Wiley, 2013). The authors, each renowned
consultants, lean on their considerable experience to provide clear philosophy
and how-to’s for this evolving field. A passage midway through captures
the book’s essence:
In the
past, prospect research was known almost exclusively for simply gathering
data. This was in the form of printing reports from the database or
compiling information on prospects. Prospect research pushed information
out in the development arena. Like gift entry and other advancement
services, a prospect researcher would not always have had regular interaction
with the frontline fundraising staff. The information was often collected
in the same way: without too much consideration for changing needs.
Today, the prospect researcher has evolved into the position of development
partner. Inundated with information, the development department relies
upon prospect research to provide strategic information and work in partnership
with frontline fundraisers to provide real-time data. More than in the
past, prospect researchers are recognized as fundraisers too, understanding
development principles and directing front-line staff to exactly the
information they need. Prospect research also creates and maintains donor
relationship management systems and introduces and assimilates new technologies
to provide an organization with competitive advantages (page 124).
Filla
and Brown have a steady vision for the work of prospect research that they hold
high on each page. They take us to insights on every facet of the work –
from understanding the different levels of research needed, and when, to the
‘hows’ of creating a donor relationship management system. In the
International prospect research chapter, they give exceptional strategy and
thought using lessons from work with Habitat for Humanity. The final
chapter reviews trends and suggests the future landscape of prospect
research. This chapter is worth acquiring the book alone as the authors
delve into content curation and look at cutting edge resources beneficial to
researchers. They address social media and how data visualization is a
powerful resource.
I
commend acquiring Prospect Research for Fundraisers to any development
operation! These ladies have assembled a crisp, ever-relevant handbook of
ideas. It is surely useful to the one-person development professional as
much as a large research shop – such as the staff of fifteen researchers I help
to lead at Vanderbilt University. The book even includes seven appendices
including resources for codes of ethics, researcher skill sets, and
relationship management concerns.
Geoff Little,
Secretary/Treasurer, APRA MidSouth
secretary@apramidsouth.org
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

